Conglomerates fight to keep their contents from 'NFT hunters'
Holding the creators accountable can be a tricky pursuit due to the global nature of exchanges
By Feb 08, 2022 (Gmt+09:00)
LG Chem to sell water filter business to Glenwood PE for $692 million


Kyobo Life poised to buy Japan’s SBI Group-owned savings bank


KT&G eyes overseas M&A after rejecting activist fund's offer


StockX in merger talks with Naver’s online reseller Kream


Mirae Asset to be named Korea Post’s core real estate fund operator



South Korea’s retail giant Shinsegae Inc. was recently tipped off that its marketing character JRilla is available for trade on New York-based NFT (non fungible token) exchange called OpenSea.
Shinsegae plans to request OpenSea to delete the item, citing lack of permission from the company.
The South Korean chaebol is not alone in actively detering the so-called NFT hunters from trying to turn their intellectual property into digital assets.
NFT sales worldwide in 2021
Unit: $ trillion
Graphics by Jerry Lee
Sources: DappRadar, Reuters
‘NFT HUNTERS’
The global NFT trade volume has been skyrocketing in recent years.
According to Reuters, the figure jumped from $94.9 million in 2020 to $24.9 billion last year.
In addition to OpenSea, Ethereum-based Rarible, Cryptopunks, and SuperRare are well-known NFT platforms worldwide.
In South Korea, Hyosung Corp.’s Meta Galaxia, operated by GalaxiaMetaverse Co. and Kakao Corp.’s Klip Drops are the best known NFT exchanges.
The digital creators' enthusiasm for existing works of art is also prevalent in fine arts.
Marketing agency Wannabe International was in the hot seat last year for trying to turn famous works of art by renowned modern artists into NFTs to auction them off. The agency’s auction plan did not materialize, hit by outrage from the original creators.
Whether Shinsegae Food Inc., the owner of JRilla's intellectual property, can have the US exchange delete the token is unclear.
“Under the South Korean copyright law, a creator’s intellectual property is protected on the internet as stipulated by Article 18 of the Public Transmission Right,” PD & Law partner Han Sang-hoon said. “There is a growing number of legal disputes as some NFT creators are turning contents into tokens without permission from the original artists and uploading them on global exchanges.”
UNCLEAR LEGAL CONSEQUENCES

US activewear giant Nike and French fashion house Hermes are also in legal battles with those who used their trademarks in the digital space.
Last week, Nike Inc. sued StockX in Manhattan federal court. The online marketplace specializing in sneaker resale used the company's trademark to create NFTs based on the image of a limited edition Nike kicks.
Some companies are preemptively releasing their own NFTs before the third parties.
Adidas launched digital tokens in Nov. 2021. Prior to the token release, the activewear giant bought a Bored Ape and outfitted it with a custom-branded tracksuit.
In South Korea, Brand X Co., which owns the leggings maker Xexymix, announced its plans to sell NFTs last week. The fashion label collaborated with Galaxia Moneytree Co. to create digital leggings as token to don avatars.
The Hyundai Department Store, for its part, applied for three NFT-related trademarks on Sunday, one of which is dubbed Meta Hyundai.
Write to Jeong-Cheol Bae at bjc@hankyung.com
Jee Abbey Lee edited this article.
-
-
CryptocurrenciesDomestic NFT art sale surpasses 3.5 bitcoin; concerns of market turbulence
Nov 30, 2021 (Gmt+09:00)
2 Min read -
CryptocurrenciesKorea's first game NFT exchange to open next month
Nov 29, 2021 (Gmt+09:00)
2 Min read -
Korean startupsNFT, metaverse shares face correction, hit by high valuations
Nov 23, 2021 (Gmt+09:00)
2 Min read -
BlockchainNCSoft to unveil NFT-based, play-to-earn games in 2022
Nov 11, 2021 (Gmt+09:00)
3 Min read