Skip to content
  • KOSPI 3127.58 -12.93 -0.41%
  • KOSDAQ 1036.26 -9.86 -0.94%
  • KOSPI200 410.46 -0.53 -0.13%
  • USD/KRW 1177.6 8.50 0.72%
  • JPY100/KRW 1,072.64 7.06 0.66%
  • EUR/KRW 1,377.09 1.53 0.11%
  • CNH/KRW 182.5 0.60 0.33%
View Market Snapshot

IPOs

Controversy surrounds SK Bioscience’s $1 bn IPO valuation  

By Feb 09, 2021 (Gmt+09:00)

Controversy surrounds SK Bioscience’s /> bn IPO valuation  
SK Bioscience Co., a spin-off of SK Chemicals Co.'s vaccine division, is set to list on the South Korean stock exchange on March 18 to raise up to $1.3 billion, in what is expected to be one of the country’s blockbuster IPOs this year.

The SK Group unit will price its shares in a band of 49,000 and 65,000 won ($44 and $58.3) apiece, valuing its entire company at up to 5 trillion won. In an initial public offering, it will float 22.95 million shares, including 15.3 million new issues, according to the company's regulatory filing on Feb. 5.

Its price band is higher than the affiliate SK Biopharmaceuticals Co.’s price range provided for its IPO that took place in July 2020, reflecting an almost 50% surge in the broader Kospi market during the period. SK Chemical owns 98% of the vaccine unit, founded in 2018.

The Korean vaccine company is expected to capitalize on investor enthusiasm for the bio industry, with retail investors flocking in droves to stock markets, pushing the benchmark index above the historically-important 3,000 point level.

But its IPO valuation seems controversial. It compared its enterprise value (EV) only with antibody-based biologics contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs), including Switzerland-based Lonza.

SK Bioscience derived 64% of sales from vaccines, including its flagship product SKY Cellflu influenza vaccine in the first nine months of last year. Distribution of multinational companies’ vaccines, including Merck & Co.’s (MSD) RotaTeq vaccine, accounted for an additional 25% of its sales. RotaTeq is one of the few two rotavirus vaccines licensed for use in children.

“Antibody-based biologics CMOs have much higher operating profit margins that vaccine CMOs,” a CMO company head told The Korea Economic Daily. “The vaccine CMO business should be separated from the antibody-based biologics CMO industry.”

Graphics by Jerry Lee
Graphics by Jerry Lee

Some defend SK Bioscience’s valuation, saying that the company has been producing AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine since September 2020. SK Bioscience also inked a contract development and manufacturing (CDMO) order for a COVID-19 vaccine candidate developed by US-based Novavax Inc. last year.

“It’s been less than six months since it started the CMO business in full swing, but it compared its business only with CMO companies. It’s unprecedented,” said a pharmaceutical industry source.

The CMO orders for pandemic-related vaccines could be a one-off boost to the Korean company, he warned.

VALUATION BASED ON CAPACITY

Further, its EV is based on the reactor capacity used to culture cells, instead of sales and orders received. To get the EVs of the companies to which it was compared, SK Bioscience's IPO managers subtracted net borrowings from their three-month average market capitalization between Nov, 2, 2020 and Feb. 1, 2021. As for Lonza, its average market cap was multiplied by the proportion of its CMO business, or 72.3%, to calculate its EV.

Based on the capacity-based valuation method, Lonza was valued at 1.27; Samsung Biologics at 1.44; and China’s WuXi Biologics at 5.21. The three companies’ average multiple of 2.64 was multiplied by SK Bioscience’s capacity of 23,924 liters to get the latter’s EV of 6.32 trillion won.

To set the IPO price range, SK Bioscience applied the discount rate of 20.99% to 40.44% to the estimated EV, after subtracting its net borrowings.

If WuXi Biologics had been excluded from the sample companies, SK Bioscience’s EV would have been cut to 1.9 trillion to 2.6 trillion won.

“WuXi Biologics has a dominant market share of 78.6% in China and has strength in CDMO. It’s strange to include the Chinese company in the list of the companies to compare with,” said another pharmaceutical industry source. “It may be because they wanted to add a high-value company.”

Back in 2016 when Samsung Biologics went public, the world’s largest CMO compared its business only with Lonza for its valuation.

Based on SK’s valuation method, the market capitalization of Kosdaq-listed Binex Co. should have exceeded 3 trillion won, more than three times its current market cap of 884.3 billion won. Binex, a South Korean-based CMO company, holds around 12,000 liters of reactor capacity, about half of SK Bioscience's.

"The argument that sales will increase in proportion of the reactor capacity seems illogical,” said another CMO industry source. “The sales gap between the companies with a 1,000 liter reactor and a 5,000 liter reactor, for example, is not simply five times, but two to three times."

In response, SK said its valuation is based on comparisons with the three most influential CMO companies, excluding highly-valued ones.

"Lonza is running various businesses, so it has something in common with us,” said an SK Bioscience official.

In the first nine months of last year, SK Bioscience earned 23 billion won in net profit, up from 14.7 billion won for the whole year of 2019. Sales came to 158.6 billion won in the January-September period, compared with 183.9 billion won for all of 2019.

NH Investment & Securities is the IPO's lead manager.

Write to Woo-Sub Kim at duter@hankyung.com

Yeonhee Kim edited this article.

Comment 0

0/300